|
BMS plant in Devens is hallmark of paradigm shift
In
1944, at the height of World War II, nobody knew what biotechnology
was. What they did know was that a funny little mold that grew on a
cantaloupe had amazing antibiotic capabilities, and promised to save
thousands of soldiers from death or amputation from infection.
The
promise was enough to convince an established New Jersey pharmaceutical
company called E.R. Squibb and Sons to open a massive production
facility, the largest of its type in the world, dedicated to producing
this strange little mold.
Breaking The Mold
And so was born penicillin, grandfather of modern biotechnology.
Today,
that company, now known as Bristol-Myers Squibb, is building a new,
$750 million facility at Devens dedicated to the production of a
different biological agent, Orencia, designed to treat rheumatoid
arthritis.
Instead of using mold from a cantaloupe, this
drug uses cells from a Chinese hamster to produce a large molecule that
stops the rheumatoid process before it starts. At its Devens
manufacturing facility, BMS hopes to produce Orencia in massive
quantities, through a totally organic process.
It is a
state of the art process, to be sure, and promises to help millions
(this columnist's mother included) suffering from the debilitating
joint disease.
Joseph Tarnowski, senior vice president,
technical operations, biologics manufacturing and process development
at BMS, says the company's latest drug is the result of a new paradigm
in the life sciences world, a combination of traditional pharmaceutical
company dedication to patients and avant-garde biotech firms'
creativity.
At a recent talk with the North Central Chamber
of Commerce, Tarnowski said this merging of traditional pharmaceutical
companies with traditional biotechnology companies into the "biopharma
model" represents the future of the industry.
Tarnowski said
that the biopharma model promises to meld the "nimbleness and
creativity" of the traditional biotech company with the "dedication to
developing products for patients" of traditional pharmaceutical
companies.
In 1944, the wild new biologic agent from the established pharmaceutical company made Squibb very successful indeed.
What's old is new again.
Regardless
of how you slice it, drugs are big business, whether they are derived
from a mold on a cantaloupe or created in a beaker over a Bunsen
burner. The biopharma model that Tarnowski champions, for all of its
collaborative promise, is about making money. Making money by making
better, more effective drugs, sure, but still making money.
Tarnowski
estimated that by 2010, 25 percent of the global pharmaceuticals market
will be biologically-derived drugs and treatments. IMS Health, a
Conn.-based provider of pharmaceutical market information, predicts the
total worldwide market for pharmaceuticals will be between $735 billion
and $745 billion in 2008. Do the math.
If pharmaceutical
companies promise to keep the patient happy, which most do, they also
must make a promise to keep shareholders happy, to keep their valuation
high and the development money flowing in.
To do this, said
Al Prescott, president of Worcester-based Crescent Innovations Inc.,
who is in the process of developing his own biotech treatment, large
companies must have a stable of products in the pipeline. In the
past, pharmaceutical companies would look for bizarre new chemicals or
proteins in the natural world that they could break down, synthesize,
make safe, and sell, Prescott said. This was both wildly expensive, and
somewhat limited. At some point, the well for weird jungle funguses
with magical healing powers would dry up.
And so the
"biopharma model" allows companies a new method of finding and
developing new products. For all its promise of breakthrough drug
discoveries, biotechnology's wonder-child, the discovery of RNAi, and
the predictability and consistency associated with its process, also
promises to make some companies a ton of money.
Tarnowski
himself admits this. When asked how the new biopharma companies would
fare in an environment already rife with mergers, acquisitions and
takeovers, Tarnowski posited that having a strong pipeline of
innovative (read: biologic) products was the best defense against
takeover.
BMS, Tarnowski said, has four such biologic
medicines already under development.
|